Thursday, May 6, 2010

Royals Today: 5/6/2010

As usual, I picked a bad week to disappear. Well, not disappear exactly – I’ve taken advantage of having the Royals in Chicago to spend a lot of time watching them at the ballpark and talking to people connected to the team. I just haven’t taken the time to write. So let’s catch up with the events of the last week:

Zack Greinke pitches brilliantly again, loses again.

I’m not sure what more I can add to this. As Posnanski pointed out a while back, going back to August 16th, 2008, Zack Greinke had made 46 starts with a 2.11 ERA – and the Royals were 22-24 in those starts.

Now, his ERA in that span is 2.08, and the Royals are 22-25.

Sometimes I wonder if the Royals were put on this earth with the express purpose of teaching the world the core principles of sabermetrics. Want to understand the importance of the base on balls? Consider that the Royals are 11-17, and have been outscored 148-113, even though they’ve outhit their opponents this season. The Royals have 270 hits; their opponents have 264. The Royals have been outhomered by a modest margin, 29-25, but the big difference is this: the Royals – as usual – rank dead last in the AL in walks drawn, with 75. And the Royals – as usual – rank dead last in the AL in walks allowed, with 123.

In 28 games, the Royals have allowed 48 walks more than they’ve drawn, a difference of nearly two walks a game. If OBP is life, the Royals are walking zombies, much as they’ve been for the last quarter century.

If you want to know why it seems like so much of the Kansas City media – and increasingly, the Kansas City fan base – is so stat-savvy even though the team itself is stuck in the 1970s, it’s precisely because we’ve seen what happens to a team that ignores 30 years of analytical progress. Royals fans understand the value of a walk, because they’ve seen first-hand the consequences of a dismissive approach to plate discipline.

And now, they understand the worthlessness of win-loss records for pitchers, because they’ve seen how even the most brilliant pitcher the majors has seen in a decade can go winless into May when the other 24 men on the roster stab him in the back.

Run support? The Royals have scored 16 runs in his six starts.

Bullpen support? In the five games that Greinke has turned the game over to the bullpen, his relievers have pitched a total of 13.1 innings – AND ALLOWED 20 RUNS. Greinke’s relievers have allowed more runs in 13.1 innings than his offense has scored in six entire games. In other words, if Greinke had not allowed a single run all season, the Royals still would have been outscored, 20-16, in his six starts.

On Sunday, Greinke was able to eliminate the bullpen from the equation – knowing that Joakim Soria was probably unavailable after pitching in three straight games, he pitched efficiently as well as brilliantly, throwing just 87 pitches in eight innings. Joe Maddon may have been exaggerating when he said that Greinke could have gone 15 innings, but I have no doubt that if the Royals had managed to score one run, Greinke would have pitched the ninth, and probably the tenth as well – becoming the first Royals’ starter to go into extra innings since Kevin Appier went 10 innings in 1992.

But the Royals, of course, didn’t score a run. And Greinke lost a 1-0 complete game for the second time since the beginning of the 2009 season. In that same span, every other starting pitcher in baseball has combined to lose a 1-0 complete game (not counting rain-shortened starts) twice.

As Joe Sheehan tweeted after the game, the Royals don’t deserve Zack Greinke. I wrote that exact phrase in a column with Rob back in 2005, and it remains equally true today.

These two articles are still parodies, I think. At the rate we’re going, one day they may not be.

Royals take advantage of their bullpen depth to trade Carlos Rosa.

It’s too easy, really, to make jokes about the fact that on Sunday the Royals, who at the time of the trade had the second-worst bullpen ERA in all of baseball, traded away Carlos Rosa, probably their most major league-ready relief prospect.

It’s too easy to see that the Royals traded Rosa for a 20-year-old shortstop with a career line in the minors of .256/.304/.338, and say that once again the Royals have made a move that defies common sense.

In this case, though, it really is too easy. The reality is a lot more complicated.

Two years ago today, Rosa was arguably the best pitching prospect in the organization, which says as much about the state of the farm system then as it says about Rosa. He was a starting pitcher with a terrific fastball – excellent velocity, excellent late life. The fastball was good enough to dominate Double-A hitters – in eight starts, he had a 1.20 ERA and allowed just 37 baserunners in 45 innings – despite a lack of a quality off-speed pitch.

The thinking was that if Rosa could just develop his off-speed stuff, he could be a #2 starter. But here we are, two years later, and Rosa is no closer to coming up with a second pitch today than he was then. He tried to develop a changeup, he tried to develop a slider, but both pitches are still below-average. And in the interim, he’s dealt with some arm woes that have sapped his fastball.

He only made 11 starts in Triple-A in 2008 because of arm trouble, and after the season the Royals decided to move him to the bullpen, as much to keep him healthy as to hide the fact that he was still a one-pitch pitcher. That winter, you may remember, the Royals were set to trade him to the Marlins for Mike Jacobs, but the Marlins were sufficiently concerned about the status of Rosa’s elbow that they backed out of the deal – forcing the Royals to substitute Leo Nunez instead. (Nunez has allowed just 3 hits and one run in 11.1 innings for Florida this year. Put him back on the Royals this year, and the team is probably at .500 instead of 11-17.)

Rosa was healthy enough to pitch in 2009, but in retrospect it’s clear that he had lost a little off his fastball, and for a guy who only had that one above-average pitch, he couldn’t afford to lose even a little. He got off to a terrible start in Omaha’s bullpen last year, and while he pitched much better the second half, he still had a 4.56 ERA for the season. In particular, his control was way off – after walking just 19 batters in 96 innings in 2008, he walked 32 batters in 71 innings last year. This year, at the time of the trade, he had walked 7 more batters in just 12 innings.

Since switching to full-time relief last season, Rosa had pitched 83 innings. He had struck out 90 batters, but he had also allowed 82 hits (including 8 homers) and 39 walks. Translated to the majors, those aren’t the numbers of a future major league closer, or even a quality set-up man. Those are the numbers of a garbage-time reliever. Factor in the scouting report on him, and I can see why the Royals were willing to get rid of him. I mean, we just had a reliever on the roster with a good-not-great fastball and no quality secondary offerings. His name was Roman Colon, and he was just sold to a Korean team. For Rosa, at least, the Royals got a prospect in return.

Navarro isn’t a great prospect by any means, but I’ve seen too many people focus on his statistics – as listed above – without mentioning his most important statistic: he’s just 20 years old. He’s 20 years old, and already in high-A ball. He’s a shortstop, and by most accounts a good one. The Royals are coming off a Lost Decade of shortstops, having featured such luminaries as Rey Sanchez, Neifi Perez, Angel Berroa, Tony Pena Jr, and now Yuniesky Betancourt. With Jeff Bianchi out for the year, shortstop glaringly remains the one position where the Royals had no quality prospects in the minors.

So I don’t know about you, but I’m willing to take a flier on a kid barely out of his teens who can switch-hit, who has at least some understanding of the strike zone (he had walked 8 times in 19 games before the trade), and at the very least isn’t a liability with the glove.

It’s a cliché to say that if the Royals make a decision about a player, the exact opposite opinion is likely to be true. But in this case, I really do trust their judgment. The fact that the Royals didn’t call up Rosa, despite a desperate need for a reliever who could keep his ERA under 6, is very telling.

And keep in mind that the Royals traded him to the Diamondbacks, the one team in baseball with a worse bullpen ERA than the Royals at the time. And then keep in mind that Allard Baird’s old assistant, Muzzy Jackson, works for the Diamondbacks and was likely the impetus for their interest in Rosa.

And then keep in mind that Muzzy’s interest in another Royals farmhand was the impetus for the last trade between these two teams, when the Royals traded Billy Buckner to Arizona – in exchange for Alberto Callaspo.

I don’t expect this trade to work out nearly as well, but I do think it’s a good trade for Kansas City. The Royals’ bullpen woes notwithstanding, you’ll rarely get burned trading away relievers, and credit to Dayton Moore for not letting the team’s current situation obscure that fact.

The Alex Gordon Era comes to an end. Sort of.

I hate it.

I hate it that the Royals, after giving Alex Gordon just 31 at-bats to prove himself this season, decided that they had seen enough. I hate it that the Royals let the return of Chris Getz – Chris Getz! – take a job away from a player who, for all his faults, remains one of the few players on the roster capable of hitting 25 homers, or mustering an OBP north of .350.

I hate the fact that once again, the Royals have managed to take a situation that seemed impossible to screw up, and screwed it up. Alex Gordon is probably the most can’t-miss prospect in the history of the organization. The #2 overall pick in the draft. College Player of the Year. Then Minor League Player of the Year, and #1 prospect in all of baseball according to multiple publications. A standing ovation in his first major league at-bat on Opening Day.

Three years later, he’s no longer a major leaguer. And he’s no longer a third baseman.

So yeah, I hate what’s become of Alex Gordon, and I hate what the Royals did to him last Sunday.

I hate it. But I agree with it.

I agree with it because ultimately, I don’t think the Royals made this move because they were dissatisfied with Gordon’s bat. I think they could no longer tolerate his glove. And I think they are right.

That batting average is a vastly overrated statistic is one of the central maxims of sabermetrics. But batting average looks like Win Shares compared to fielding average, which is such a useless stat that even the mainstream media rarely mentions it anymore.

But even fielding average is useful at the extremes. And with four errors in just 10 games at third base, Gordon’s defense was certainly extreme. His fielding average is .765. Seven-six-five. Anything under .950 is terrible; anything under .900 is historically bad. Fielding .765 is like batting .110 – just like there’s no combination of power and walks that can make a .110 average look good, there’s no amount of range that can make up for booting or throwing away a quarter of your fielding opportunities.

Not that Gordon’s range was any good either. In 84 innings at third base, he made just 13 plays, for a range factor of 1.39 plays per 9 innings. That’s exactly half the major league average of 2.78 plays per 9 innings for a third baseman.

Prefer more advanced statistics? puts Gordon at 4 runs below average – 4 runs in just 10 games. has him at -4.2 runs. That translates to close to 70 runs below average over a full season.

The only saving grace here is sample size – maybe it was just a bad 10 games. A really, really bad 10 games. If Gordon had a history or a reputation for being a quality third baseman, that would be a legitimate excuse. He has neither. Gordon, at his best, was an average third baseman, and he hasn’t been at his best for much of his career. I’m not sure that this is the right time to pull the plug, but I’m not sure that it isn’t either.

Particularly since the domino effect of moving Gordon away from third base is that the Royals can move Callaspo away from second base. Far, far away. We might not be certain that Gordon will never play a quality third base – but we can be damn well certain that Callaspo will never be even an adequate second baseman. He was bad last year; he was downright intolerable this season. He missed line drives six inches over his head; he couldn’t run down balls in the hole that were ten feet to his left; his double play pivot was neither quick nor graceful.

I’m not nearly as convinced as the Royals are that Chris Getz is an excellent defensive second baseman. Frankly, it doesn’t matter. Even if he’s just adequate, replacing Gordon with Getz upgrades the defense at two positions. Callaspo’s skills translate much better at third base than at second. He has agility and reasonable first-step quickness, which plays well at third – he’s just ungodly slow. On the basepaths, he runs like a catcher, and Craig Biggio aside, there’s a reason you never see catchers move to second base.

My main concern with demoting Gordon to Omaha was that the Royals would move him to first base, which would be unbelievably dumb, given that they have Kila Ka’aihue ready and Eric Hosmer not far behind. But they moved him to left field instead. I suggested that the Royals move him to a corner outfield spot as early as two years ago, and while it’s far from an ideal position given the offensive demands, it’s more ideal than the alternatives.

My other concern was that the demotion was punitive, rather than corrective, in nature – that the Royals were simply fed up with Gordon, and that he likely had played his last game in a Royals uniform. But multiple sources close to the team assure me that the team really is sincere about giving Gordon another chance – maybe just one more chance – as an everyday player, once he’s mastered the nuances of the outfield. There’s a good chance that neither Scott Podsednik nor Rick Ankiel will be back next season, Guillen is as good as gone, and even David DeJesus may not return, either because of a trade or because the Royals elect not to pick up his option.

So the opportunity will be there for Gordon to play regularly in the outfield; he just better be sure to take advantage of the opportunity this time, because there may not be another one. I hate that it’s come to this, that Alex Gordon, superstar third baseman of the future, is now Alex Gordon, hopefully-adequate left fielder of the present. But as I’m fond of saying, what’s past is prologue. Gordon isn’t the player that we thought he would be. But if we accept him for the player that he is, we might be pleasantly surprised by his worth.

More to come, but I have a radio show to get ready for, so I’ll try to pick back up as soon as possible.


Anonymous said...

I dont mind Gordon moving to LF. He probably has enough speed to be adequate there, and it's not like the Royals have anyone that will play corner outfield with more upside in the minors.

Anonymous said...

Wow, an amazingly supportive article. It's good to see you thinking that the Royals front office is doing the right thing for a change.

Anonymous said...

Dude, trading top pospects for not-so-good prospects, keepin' Greinke, leaving the Kila Monster in AAA, etc, etc... it's all part of the process. No pain no gain.

RoyalPug said...

Rany, I've got to say I'm disappointed in you a little here.

I agree totally about zack and Rosa, and am a little suprised you didn't mention Avilanche or Hawaiian punch, but I'm disappointed by your defense of the Gordon move.

Look, we all know that Gordon wasn't good at defense this year, we know his range declined a bit. But to use his four THROWING errors, while he is playing with a BAD THUMB on his THROWING hand, and just as importantly to use 10 games worth of defensive stats as justification for this move is RIDICULOUS. flat out ridiculous.

I agree it isn't pretty to see him making 4 errors, and I admit it is like batting .110.

But its like batting .110 in a series. Its comparable to a guy getting 9 AB's getting 1 hit, and the organization sending him down.(Not of course that the Royals arn't beyond doing that, if I recall they basically gave Aviles just 4 ABs in 2008 before basically deciding they were not going to play him.)

At the end of the day the reason Gordon got sent down was because of perspective. The Royals percieve that Gordon is a failure and so they take these minor failings as proof. They ignore the .340 OBP, the game winning homerun, the power potential, the performance sapping injuries, because they don't fit their perceptions.

And to try to use stats to back that up, when nearly every other stat and projection system shows that even an injured underacheiving Gordon is still probably the 4th or 5th best player on this team is RIDICULOUS.

Anonymous said...

To those that want Gordon up: here's the interesting part of Rany's defense -- he might make the Royals better now, but it almost seems like they are also doing what is best for the player. If can play a decent left and hit again, then he has value to other organizations too. Right now, a below-average defensive 3B with only the ability to take a walk is not a recipe for long-term success.

Anonymous said...

rany, is there any statistical analysis of runners thrown out at 3rd and home plate? it's painful to watch dave owen handle baserunners so poorly. the royals have to be high up in getting guys thrown out. there have been at least 3 or 4 times i have seen guys be safe that had no business getting lucky because of mishandled throws, etc. just tonight aviles almost gets thrown out at the plate b/c owen has one hand up trying to decide what to do. aviles was safe, but if owen was paying attention, then aviles is safe standing up easy and doesn't have to slide hard into a catcher blocking the plate. little league teams do a better job of running the bases than the royals for the last few years. owen costs the royals precious runs and is going to get someone hurt unnecessarily.

John said...

There's another possibility to consider. Gordon hasn't been as good as the Royals hoped either offensively or defensively, but he is an asset on offense. I wonder if his apparent inability to progress beyond a certain point with the bat is because of the pressure he is under defensively. There is a long list of players who busted out with the bat once they were removed from a defensive position that they were stretched to handle. Just a few examples: remember what happened when the Braves figured out that Dale Murphy wasn't a catcher, Ron Gant wasn't a second baseman and Chipper Jones wasn't a shortstop?

You know that if the Royals went so far as to demote Gordon to AAA for the express purpose of learning the outfield, that they must have been riding him about his poor defense for much longer. Now, if Gordon played for Bobby Cox like those ex-Braves did, he would have recognized the problem and made this move two years ago, like Rany suggested. Gordon would probably be hitting .295-.315 with 30 homers a year now. But these are the Royals. Better late than never.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

made a legitimate $10,000 bet saying that the Royals will win a World Series before I die. I'm a healthy 25 years old. My opponent gets the 10K in my will, or his children do. Bad bet?

fredrik said...

Fabulous article as always. One quibble, though: does this claim...

"the most brilliant pitcher the majors has seen in a decade"

...really hold up under scrutiny? Tim Lincecum was much better than Greinke in 2008, and has been much better in 2010 (though Greinke has been excellent); Greinke was better in 2009, but not by a mile. Like Greinke, Lincecum is a fascinating performer, a guy surrounded by mythos, a guy whose won/loss record understates his achievements. Greinke is certainly in the conversation for "most brilliant pitcher", but placing him at the top of the major league heap without any caveats strikes me as homerism. We can love him without overstating the case.

Anonymous said...

It is sad that with a couple of tweaks to his stance and swing he could be a star. I don't know if the Royal's coaches are afraid of telling him what to do... or if he is unwilling to take advise? His swing is way to slow for the major league level.... his mechanics take his bat head away from the outer half of the plate. It's like a golf player trying to swing at a golf ball with a baseball grip.

Anonymous said...

As an Astros fan, Gordon kind of reminds me of Phil Nevin (without the intolerable personality). Nevin was supposed to be a star, a top pick, but turned out to be a bad defensive 3B. Nevin's attitude problems, despite whatever problems Gordon is rumored to have, were far, far worse than anything Gordon has done, which may mean that the Royals might have the privilege of enjoying the late-blooming good years once he figures it out.

(Of course all of this obtusely ignores the very real possibility that what Nevin "figured out" was how to use PEDs to his benefit).

Anonymous said...

You'd have a bad attitude, too, if you were jerked around the way Nevin was early in his career. They even tried to make a catcher out of him, for crying out loud.

If a guy can't hack it at a certain defensive position, then put him at an easier one and let him focus on hitting. Nevin is a good parallel for Gordon, and I thought about him myself when the subject came up.

Anonymous said...

Nevin didn't try to become a catcher until well after he was shipped out of Houston.

I don't remember the exact circumstances, but he had a ridiculous sense of entitlement when he first cam up, throwing tantrums about a bunch of stuff on top of generally sucking (hit .117). He was such a pain he was traded after just a month or so for a 6 weeks of Mike Henneman.

gsmith601 said...

Rany thanks for the update. I agree on Rosa have watched him the last couple years in Omaha and he just didn't seem to have "it."

I do think Gordon (and trust me as a native Nebraskan and Nebraska Alum, I'm pro Gordon) and his defense have been lacking. Even prior to this year I've seen too many drops of easy plays. I also hope they work on his at bats, he seems to strike out a lot on down and away pitches.

Rany-future topic, maybe off season, how about a look at 2 years down the road and will our current prospects (Hosmer, Moustakas, Montgomery, Myers) be in KC or close to show Greinke promise in the organizaion.


28 years and counting said...

A funny side note to walks (or lack thereof) and Gordon; as it stands he has the fifth highest OBP on the team and could easily move-up (even with the below-mendoza BA).

I still haven't heard anyone bring-up the fact that Gordon might be more realistic in RF, not LF. The Royals will almost certainly bring back either S Pods or DDJ next year, both much better fits in LF than RF???

KHAZAD said...

In the 25 Royal's team losses with Zack on the mound since 8/16/08, Zack's ERA in the losses is 2.96.

The offense has scored 2.24 runs per game in these losses and the defense has given up 20 unearned runs ( behind Zack and or relievers) This makes their net contribution 1.44 runs per game.

The Bullpen has a 9.16 ERA in these losses and have given up more earned runs than Zack in 103.1 less innings. They have also given up more earned runs than the Royals have scored in the entire games.

The Royals are 12-20 when he gives up an earned run and only 10-5 when he doesn't.

What does Zack have to do for the Royals to win? In the 22 victories over this span he has a 1.20 ERA.

Travis said...

What does Zack have to do for the Royals to win?
Hhe needs to hit for himself. He should expect to come up to bat 3 times, and he needs to hit 3 home runs. THis will give him 3 runs to try for the win. Disclaimer: this may not solve enough of the errors problem to keep the opposition from scoring.

Unknown Royals Fan said...

I love the Gordon move. I love it most because it means that the Royals have finally shown the desire to maximize Callaspo. On his best day in the major leagues, it's unlikely that Gordon will ever be the bat that Callaspo is. One of my biggest bitches about the Royals is their constant refusal to simply put their best nine on the field. This signifies a change, and I'm thankful for it.

Kansas City said...

The Jacobs trade in hindsight was a disaster. I have heard that the Marlins were intending to release Jacobs rather than pay him the $3.5 Million or so he would get in arbitration. Does anyone know if that is really true?

Kansas City said...

This is after the Friday night game in Texas where Zach lost again and Yuni dropped the pop up.

HOW ON EARTH CAN MOORE, AFTER AT LEAST 15 YEARS OF TOTAL FRUSTRATION IN KC, HAVE PUT TOGETHER A TEAM WITH OLD PLAYERS THAT HAS NO CHANCE OF MAKING THE PLAYOFFS? A lousy team might be unavoidable this year, but a lousy team with old players is unforgivable.

The Yuni drop was the moment at which the chance of Yuni being successful in KC dropped to zero (it was not very high prior to the drop). There is a large photo on the front page of the KC Star sports section, graphically showing everything he did wrong on the play - not looking at the ball, glove to the side, feet somehow crossed, and dropping the ball. To be charitable, maybe there was a small chance that the trade would have been a wake up to Yuni and changed his game. It has not. Time to move on. I doubt that Avilles is the answer, but release Yuni and see what Avilles can do. Or, at an absolute minimum, make Yuni start catching pop ups the right way.

Before the year is over, get rid of or release Podsednick, Guillen, Yuni, and Ankiel, putting Avilles, Gordon, Myers and Kia in the line up and see what we got with them. I would include Kendall, but he does look like a decent defensive catcher, and the move there is to split time with Pena and see if there is any chance of Pena being a regular catcher.

Kansas City said...

Make that Maier, not Myers. I think the criteria for starting on the Royals should whether there is realistic any chance that the player will be part of a future winning Royals team. If not, don't start the guy, or at least get rid of him by the All Star break.

Anonymous said...

Kansas City, have you watched any games this year? Podsednik is having a great year and Guillen has bounced back nicely as well. Cut these guys when they have value and are helping us win? You are clueless. At the least, trade them for prospects at the deadline. I'm betting Pods is back next year however.....

Kansas City said...


Who's clueless.

I did not say cut Pods or Guillen. I said "before the year is over" release or get rid of (i.e., trade) the old guys and get the young guys in the lineup. I also just said "or at least get rid of him by the All Star break." Who do you think that refers to? I will help you out. Any one of the old guys who won't be on a Royals winning team of the future but is having a good year AND therefore have some July trade value.

Pods is having "a great year?" He is off to a good start over 110 at bats. See me in September and tell me he has had a great year. I'm actually okay with looking at what Pods does for a while, because I think we have an option on him for next year. So if he continues to have a 380 OBP and we can't get a prospect for him, keep him.

You want Guillen playing for the Royals in August and September, taking at bats away from Kia and Gordon?

Guillen is hitting 275 with a 318 OBP. Better than anyone expected, but where do you think he will be in September. What good is he ever going to do for a future winning Royals team? Unless it is him on an opposing team striking out against the Royals on sliders 6 to 12 inches outside and/or low, not much.

Stephen Bubalo said...

The game just wrapped up and all I have to say is that it's so frustrating to watch the Royals play. Not moving runners, not scoring runners in scoring position with less than two outs, hitting into untimely double plays, making costly errors. That'll put you at 11-20.

Anonymous said...

The game just wrapped up tonight and all I have to say is that it's so frustrating to watch the Royals play. Not moving runners, not scoring runners in scoring position with less than two outs, hitting into untimely double plays, making costly errors. That'll put you at 11-20.

Kansas City said...

Plus, Hillman inexplicably had Meche throw 128 pitches. What an idiot.

Anonymous said...

Not sure why that posted twice. Anyway, yeah that was a brilliant move. Ya know, because it worked so well the last time it happened.

Anonymous said...

With more fly ball opportunities, will Gordon keep doing that weird thing where he keeps his glove at his knee until the very last second, than flash it up and try to catch it to the side, one handed, often missing? That probably won't work very well in the outfield.

I'm still high on Gordon, btw... that's just a maddening quirk of his.

Wabbitkiller said...

Personally I hope I've seen the last of Alex Gordon. As bad as his defense is, watching him flail away at low-and-away off speed stuff...and missing... time and time again has gotten even more old. Good Riddance Alex.

Anonymous said...

Rany, good commentary, albeit brief on the "Seattle Way". That being said, a well trained monkey could have, in the short term, corrected the mess that Bavasi had created prior to Jackie Z arriving on the scene. I am not going to bash him for doing what needed to be done, but I pointed out on my blog that the M's were "lucky" last year by their win differenctial (PECOTA) and that while the further moves that they made this year made for good press here in Seattle, were certainly not a solution. They are not so "lucky" this year. They can't hit, play sloppy on the basepaths and dont seem to understand how to situational hit. In addition, they dont seem to have anyone on the roster that can pitch after the 7th inning. Love to go into detail on this but just wanted to post my 2 cents.

I am seeing that he is taking what he did in Milwaukee and bringing it here which is a good thing, but the fans out here need to acquire the same level of patience that the fans in KC have.

Anonymous said...




Anonymous said...




Anonymous said...;u=13963;u=9192;u=2246;u=40013;u=24117;u=19413;u=22992