There’s nothing like a summer weekend under the sweltering hot sunshine watching the Royals wage war on the White Sox pitching staff. (Especially when you can watch the games in your lovely air-conditioned home.) The Baseball Jonah has shaken off his White Sox demons, Mike Aviles is hitting .340 (wait…what?), Billy Butler has eight hits in his last three games, and Robinson Tejeda was absolutely dealing today.
Trey Hillman has apparently taken my advice – or yielded to common sense – and moved Guillen to DH,
Let’s enjoy it while we can.
In the meantime, it’s time to revisit the Nickname Project, something I’ve been promising to do for a few months now. I find it incredibly amusing that if I were to end this blog today, its one enduring legacy would be The Mexicutioner. Amusing, but also gratifying. The goal of this blog is to write about the team from a fan’s perspective, objectivity be damned, but because of the healthy attitude that the
I’m also greedy. The Mexicutioner got the Dutton Seal of Approval™, as did Shake Yabuta, who unfortunately (or fortunately) is unlikely to ever require use of that nickname again. But we’ve still got a few dozen players to go.
So it’s time to unveil the official Rany on the Royals nickname for another member of the team.
Henceforth – with a nod to poster Zach, who I believe was the first person to suggest this nickname – Billy Butler shall be known as Bam Bam.
If you heard my interview with Kevin Kietzman on Thursday you know the reasons why I love this nickname so much. In summary:
- Billy Butler. Bam Bam. A little alliteration never hurts.
- Bam Bam is a baby. Billy Butler has been the youngest player on the team every day that he has spent in the majors. As a rookie, he was younger than all but two other players in the American League; even this season, only three players younger than
- Most importantly, all Bam Bam ever did was hit things with a wooden stick, and despite his youth was phenomenally destructive with one. All Billy Butler does (at least well) is hit things with a wooden stick – and when he makes contact, hide the women and children.
The key to any nickname catching on is that there should be no ambiguity about who you’re referring to. If you told a Royals fan that one of the team’s players was called “Bam Bam”, even a casual fan would know immediately that you were referring to
(Wikipedia lists the son of Barney and Betty Rubble as “Bamm-Bamm.” I think we’ll stick with the simpler spelling here, if for no reason than to avoid the ire – and the lawyers – of the Hanna-Barbera folks.)
The only possible concern with the nickname is that
We can work on Greinke and the Brain, Mr. Incredible and The Smirk and Stubble and Sybil later. Right now, the Mexicutioner needs a friend. I think he and Bam Bam will get along famously.
42 comments:
You know John Buck looks a lot like Mr. Clean with his bald head. Some variation of that for him? The Cleaner?
Bam Bam is ok for Butler. Personally, I prefer the funny ones like B-Butt, or the various names they call him on Yahoo's RotoArcade, like Mr. Belvedere. He had an Ass-O-Meter for a while, and fellow fans of Billy's are called Buttheads.
Ryan actually used it once today during the broadcast when Butler came up to bat.
Talk about baseball, please. You're obsessed with nicknames.
Chris
I actually like Bam Bam for Billy. Especially because of this picture from Getty Images:
http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/77093225.jpg?v=1&c=NewsMaker&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193E7907F767875D197116093BECBAC1B11C7631F868A8C7D54
It's fitting if you ask me.
Off topic but I sweltered my way through the game today and I was very impressed with Zack. He was pitching more to contact, but nearly everything was low and he wasn't trying to overpower anyone with his stuff, because as hot as it was, if a ball was in the air, especially to left, it was going a long way. After two fairly lengthy delays, he came out trying to strike out all of the subs that Ozzie had put in and was knocked around a little, plunked Swisher and his day was done. All in all, I was very impressed.
One that may work is one that has picked up over on the ESPN board. The Answer for Aviles. That has been used fairly often.
Now for some baseball. I was hoping after such an awesome display of hitting you would have talked more about that tonight. Especially with the Answer making Guillen's hotstreak look like an average month by Pena.
Why haven't the Royals released Pena yet? He no longer plays in the one area he has value and that is as a late inning defensive replacement.
What are the Royals waiting for with Kila? He now has 3HRs in his first 5 games in AAA.
The two players who were in the lineup today at any point and had an average of over .300 at the end of the game were the Answer and Maier. It just so happens that they are also the two guys they brought up that were position players as well. Coincidence? I think not.
I hope you see this Rany because I'd love to know the answer to this and have not been able to find it myself. What is the general opinion or actual success rate of running on contact from third with one out as opposed to not doing so? It seems like this is highly unsuccessful when you consider the only time it makes a difference. If anyone else has a comment on this I'd love to hear it.
I agree with anonymous #3. Let's talk about baseball. To me nicknames have to be spontaneous. The sport of baseball is much more interesting than trying to make up nicknames.
One big current topic would be the tension between the options for the rest of the season. All of a sudden we find ourselves on a winning trend. So, do you mess with it and do some of the development experiments we need to try? Or let it run?
What are some of those experiments? 1st base puzzle, bring up Shealy? bring up Kila?
Move Soria to starter?
At any rate, I sure hope we can grab a series win against the new evil empire the BloSox.
By the way, how many people believe the beanings on Aug 3 were accidental vs purposeful? I tend to think that both Carrasco and Greinke did what they did accidentally. However, I don't blame Olivo for thinking otherwise. And, I wish several more guys had landed good pummelings on Pierzynski, just for good measure!
They should have let Olivo stay in the game. Nobody likes Pierzinski anyway.
Bam-Bam is perfect for Billy. May it always be so.
What is truly odd is that the Burlington Bees (A) also had a bit of a brawl in their game yesterday afternoon. Their 2B was trying to score from second on a single to right but the throw home beat him and their was a relatively standard collision at the plate. But the opposing catcher took offense with *something* and punked the guy in the back of the helmet, knocking it off. Benches cleared (more out of duty than of righteous fury), catcher ejected, etc. etc. Amusing to think that the Fort Wayne pitcher had already plunked three batters, and then his *battery-mate* got ejected.
Anyhoo, at what point to we begin to admit that Billy Butler will not make us lose more than two games a year while playing first base? I mean, he makes plenty of scoops, has yet to get hit in the back by a cutoff throw, and he's even done okay on the handful of 3-6-1 double-play opportunities he's had. I know that we have *actual* first basemen in the pipeline (see Shealy, Ryan and K?????, Kila), but Billy seems like he's nearly at Mike Sweeney level with the glove. He should be playing first everyday until further notice.
Speaking of Mike Sweeney, I have a question: if Sween-dog is back playing and off the DL when the A's come to KC later this year, are we cheering him before EVERY at bat, or just his first? I miss the big guy. The only guy I know who has a trademark pine tar stain on the back of his jersey.
I would probably avoid Greinke and the Brain when referring to Greinky and Bannister. The lyrics for the theme song to "Pinky and the Brain" includes:
They're Pinky and The Brain
Yes, Pinky and The Brain
One is a genius
The other's insane.
Some may find this to be offensive considering Greinke's history.
Over at Royals Review, we re-did the lyrics to that song back in May to better reflect the pair. The first stanza now goes:
They're Greinke and the Brain
Yes Greinke and the Brain
One is a genius,
The other throws flames.
They're Royals pitchers, true,
But they're a fearsome duo
They're Greinke, They're Greinke and the Brian.
Another possible nickname for Aviles: "Avilanche"
That's what Royals Review uses now. It both plays off his name, and reflects his power and productivity.
Anyone think that Buck looks like the Frankenstein Monster? Put a couple of bolts on his neck and he's dead ringer. Especially now with the bald head. He's got the height and the size, he's a veritble monster as is! If only his home run numbers would begin to reflect what sheer power the Monster moniker portrays...
The Baseball Jonah isn't going to fly, just give up on it.
Once Kila gets up here, then he can be the Kansas City Killa. (as in ball Killa, not literally a killer)
BTW, Wikipedia is right this time. The official Hanna-Barbera site also refers to the character as "Bamm-Bamm Rubble". Which isn't to say that the WB lawyers won't call the Royals if the team decides to merchandise it.
http://www2.warnerbros.com/web/hannabarbera/downloads.jsp?section=DOWNLOADS
Does anyone want to respond to my question about the success rate of running on contact from third? I have no idea where a stat like that would be or if one exists. It would be interesting to see if someone else has written an article about it but I haven't found anything.
It seems that the only time it becomes both relevant and successful is on balls hit a certain distance to the left or right of a fielder or balls that are hit very slowly. When the infield is playing in, it has even less of an effect as the ball usually has to get through the infield anyways.
Most managers in the league do this frequently and, at least for the Royals, it seems to have a fairly low success rate. One that does not warrant it's use.
I have a second question. Does anyone think we hit worse against pitchers who have worse control than against those that have better control? The reason I ask is that I think that due to our free swinging nature and lack of patience at the plate, we end up swinging at worse pitches and doing less well against these types of pitchers.
The perfect example would be against Cabrera of the Orioles. He leads the AL in BBs and has a 5ERA. He has pitched against us twice and picked up two CGs and had a combined line of 10H, 3ERs, 1BB, and 9Ks. He threw 105 pitches with 73 strikes in the first and 116-76 in the second.
This requires pitch fx readings I think and I'm not good with analyzing them or getting my hands on them.
Waaaahhhhhhhhhhhh! Nickname talk. Me want to talk about baseball...
- Bam Bam
Yeah, who cares about nicknames right now. Leave that to Chris Berman. Let's talk about Meche continuing his second half dominance tonight against the Manny-less Sox. Except for Beckett tomorrow, I like our chances to win 2 of 3 the way we're playing ball right now. I just hope DeJesus is back tonight, I'm not sold on Maier doing his best impression of Teahen's little brother.
There really seems to be a need for a post on the Pena Phenomenon. I mean, how IS this guy still on this roster? What possible benefit could there be to his continued presence (other than to make Dayton feel better about the wasted move)? I think that both the Gathright and Pena situations/decisions have been put off or mishandled because Dayton doesn't want to admit defeat (or that he was wrong about them in the first place).
It would appear that some combination of Butler and Shealy or Kaaihue needs to be the Royals' 1B/DH platoon for the immediate future. They really need to get both Shealy and Kaaihue up here for the rest of the year to see which one of them can take the other spot. Try to find another corner OF (Dunn or Burrell...maybe either one would be a pipe dream?) in the off season, and when they break spring training 2009, this could be one of the best lineups KC has seen in YEARS.
Rany - I would be interested to see the rankings of the Royal's position players sorted by the team's W-L record when they are in the starting lineup. In other words, which position player has the best winning percentage when he starts?
Lance
Isaac,
There are lots of things to consider on whether to have the "contact" play on with a runner on third base only and one out. (If there are zero outs, then you want to keep the runner on third with one out since he can still score without a hit. If there are runners on first and third, the defense will take the double play and surrender the run, and with runners on second and third, you will still have a runner on third base even if your guy is thrown out at home.)
So if there is a runner only on third and one out, that is the key question.
If the defender makes the play cleanly enough to take the out at home plate, then the runner must get into a run down long enough to get the batter to second base. Since the offense was going to need a hit to score, having the baserunner at second base instead of third isn't a huge loss.
Unless the batter is a poor baserunner, at which point he might not score even with the good jump he should get since there are two outs.
And unless the batter on deck is a player like Gathright, against whom outfielders play so shallow so as to make scoring from second a dicey proposition.
Bottom line is that each decision has to take into account a lot of factors, and the judgment can be close as to whether it is a good play on balance.
Fellow Royals fans, you whine and get angry about stupid things. Nicknames are baseball.
Anyways, I'm mad that the umpire apologized to Guillen for throwing Carrasco out. The White Sox are using the excuse that they would never throw at anyone down by ten with the bases loaded. If you're down by ten, isn't the best time to throw at someone? I think Guillen purposefully was trying to fire up his team especially with Royals back in Chicago in a week. He always wants them to have a chip on their shoulder.
If you don't believe me, look at the Gameday summary of the at-bat. Three pitches were high and tight. All were 90 mph not "82mph or "80mph" like Guillen claimed afterward.
Guillen also "claimed" that if he wanted to have a pitcher hit someone, he'd bring up Bobby Jenks or one of the other guys with a good fastball. That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Who cares if Carrasco gets suspended. If Jenks gets suspended that hurts your team. Guillen is great at creating a lot of smoke to distract everyone from what he's maniacal mind is trying to do.
I hope Nick Swisher has a big old bruise on his hip. The White Sox can kiss my butt.
What was even stupider than the referees apologizing is that they said "because a review of video from the game showed that the pitches that hit Olivo were not intentional." What? How the hell do they come up with that? The, my view of the video showed that Greinke's was not intentional as well.
I agree, I hate the White Sox. I think they have the worst a-hole attitude in the league.
I still like Billy "The Beav" Butler because he closely resembles one Theodore Cleaver.
seriously, let's save the nicknames for when the royals are in a losing streak (which will probably be soon enough). they don't give us many chances to talk good about them, let's not waste an opportunity when they do. save the nicknames for a rainy day. . .
i have one for Ryan Shealy Mr. Why does Ross Gload have my roster spot
"Bam Bam" was also used by Omaha players last year to refer to their then-teammate Craig Brazell (who did not like the name).
Billy's nickname should only be used connected with his name. "Bam Bam" Butler, or Billy "Bam Bam" Butler sound a lot better than just "Bam Bam". It just roles off the tongue better.
Curtis,
I was referring to a situation with one out and either 3rd only or 2nd and 3rd. In the case of second and third, if the runner on third gets caught in a run down then you end up with first and third with two outs instead of second and third and two outs.
In the situation of having a runner on third and one out it then gives you a runner on second and two outs and two outs instead of a runner on third and two outs which negates any infield hit or on some sharply hit line drives to the outfield.
Either way it makes your situation worse than if you had not run at all. What I question is does it make a difference in the situations where the man from third wouldn't score if they hadn't run on contact. That doesn't even include all balls hit that remain in the infield and includes none of the balls hit to the outfield.
Any contribution to my second question?
Thank you very much for your response. I appreciate it.
Rany, Why do you keep stealing nicknames from RoyalsReview.com without giving them credit? They had Mexicutioner before it was mentioned here and I've seen them useing Bam Bam for a while now.
Rany, I love, love, love your work. I have every BP annual since 1997. But I have to say, The Baseball Jonah is the single worst nickname ever, in any sport, game, career, or any other human endeavor. I can't even think of terms that carry the appropriate level of perjority for that nickname.
Frankly, I agree with Anonymous. So very, very tired of nickname talk.
I like boom Boom Butler, better. But tomato, tomaHto.
no
more
nicknames
please
I like the nicknames. I love Bam-Bam for Butler and I think The Baseball Jonah is very good as well.
Regarding other items...
Did anybody else go nuts when Hillman had German bunting (I think it was Friday night when we were down 4-2 in the 7th with 2 guys on 1st and 2nd and no outs) or was it just me. I thought it was a bad play.
Is there any news on Hosmer and Mehlville. I want them both signed but we really need to get Mehlvile signed because we don't get a pick back next year if we don't sign him.
When you have Davies going against Buerhle and you win, things are going your way!
The Royals have won 7 out of 8. Kila was promoted to AAA where we now have 2 first basemen who could potentially be better than Gload as everyday players. Butler is hitting like we thought he would. Aviles is excelling. Gordon has learned patience. Pena is still on this team inexplicably.
Why are we talking about nicknames now? Lets talk Royals. They are only 7 games below .500. What does it mean if they finish around .500?
If they finish above .500 then I win $50 from a friend. So, we have that going for us!
TPJ
Can someone explain to me why the With Cheese are wasting a roster spot on this power-tool? Do the RWC really believe he won't clear waivers? And more importantly, why should they care if he doesn't?
Is there some kid of protection clause buried in bargaining agreement between MLB and the Major League Players Association that states that if your dad played in the bigs you're a "legacy" and can't be cut until your batting average drops below .125?
And didn't TPJ arguably misplay or at least not communicate with Gordon on a ball that fell in in the 9th and could have cost the RWC the game last night?
I don't even want to see this clown used as a defensive replacement anymore, even in a blowout.
This weekend Aviles had a chance to go 5-5 but instead TPJ has to get in when he can't possibly harm the team in a futile attempt to justify his continued presence on the roster.
Waive him and be done with it.
My cursory research indicates that the RWC B.M.A. [before Mike Aviles played everyday] are: in 60 games: 23-37 (.383 winning %)
A.M.A. = 53 games and 30-23 (.566 winning %).
So for you KU grads, that's 14 games over .500 B.M.A. and 7 games over .500 A.M.A.
Gotta be a total conincidence, right?
Is it absurd to think that if Mike Aviles starts the season at short (which obviously wasn't going to happen), or even gets called up and starts playing every day after 30 games instead of 60, the RWC are .500 or better right now?
I don't think so.
After all a .566 winning % projects to 92-70, while .383 projects to 62-100.
And I feel certain that's where the RWC would be if TPJ had been allowed to make an ass out of himself on the ballclub for 150-162 games on his way to what would have been the worst offensive production from an everyday player in the history of big-league baseball.
Mike Aviles
The RWC had lost 10 in a row when Aviles made his debut (before inexplicably sitting on the bench for six games, the first of which the RWC lost to complete their dirty dozen 0-12 stretch of 5/19 through 5/30).
After Aviles began starting every game or almost every game the RWC ripped off their 11-1 stretch of 6/14 - 6/27.
And you know the RWC were probably a kunt hair away from sending the kid back down if he starts out 2 for 20. Now he's the co-AL player of the week and the RWC are still not mathmatically eliminated from winning 82 games, which, in my mind, is a step in the right direction.
I also heard this morning that Meche's ERA has dropped every month and he should probably have AT LEAST three more wins that he's got since he's given up three or less after 6 or more innings pitched AT LEAST three times. (research it yourselves, i gots to do at least SOME work on my "day job").
Peace in extreme Southeastern WyCo.
P.S. Mexecutioner is spelled with 3 "e"s and 1 "i". Not 2 of each. Rather obvious when you consider that it's just executioner with an M in front of it. I know Dutton and Keitz did the same thing, but what can you expect from them.
For the record, the version that I registered the copyright on is spelled "M e x e c u t i o n e r".
But that may be the intent, to try to avoid infringement and/or payment of royalties to the Jester by intentionally misspelling it, ala "McDowell's" in Coming to America.
Jester,
Are you an MU grad? I thought so. 23 - 37 is 14 games UNDER .500. ;-)
But, I agree totally on Aviles. "Who IS that guy?"
John Buck=Buck Night
Alex Gordon=A-Gor (Like Igor)
Zack Greinke=The Greink That Stole Basehits
Ron Mahay=Ron "Mayday" Mahay (like Sam Malone's nickname on Cheers)
Mark Teahen=Steve (why not?)
touche, cyclone Kevin.
i know that i typed "under" and not "over".
the only plausible explantion i can think of for the discrepancy is that TPJ has so much time on his hands that he has figured out a way to hack into my account and he replaced the "und" with "ov" in a futile attempt to make it seem as thought the RWC are twice as successful, or perhaps a better way to say it would be only half as shitty, with him starting as they are with Aviles.
oh, and no, i did not graduate from MU.
i was on track, but in advanced chemistry i never could learn the recipe for cooking meth and blowing the roof off of my house in Lee's Skummit.
as everyone knows, no accredited instution of lower .... errrrrrr... i mean higher learning in the state of Misery can confer upon a student a degree until prospective graduate learns both that and how to apply for a government grant to turn one of the many six-foot deep potholes on the Misery side of State Line into a community swimming pool.
Aviles is truely the Answer for the royals problems at short
(and it works for an electronic nic name)
Post a Comment