Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Chapter 3.

Alright, break’s over.

On October 2nd I got the opportunity to attend Game 2 of the NLDS in Chicago, courtesy of my good friend Affan, a lifelong Cubs fan who had procured four very nice tickets for us and our wives. I had never been to a playoff game before, and my wife had never been to Wrigley Field before, a fact of which she has complained about for years. (Which has been a constant source of amusement for me given that my wife knows nothing about baseball, and cares even less.) You want a game, honey? Here’s a game. I felt a little sheepish about wasting a Cubs playoff ticket on someone who was going just to see and be seen, but what the hell – I figured I knew enough about baseball for the two of us.

We had seats way down the left field line, but right against the wall – my elbow was in fair territory when I rested my arm on the railing. We were about 25 feet farther down the line than where Bartman sat, and before the game I was trying to mentally prepare myself to make quick decisions about whether to go after a ball that was drifting into the first row based on which team was in the field (I’ve grown sort of fond of the Cubbies, and man, I hate the Frank McCourt-era Dodgers. Good for the Phillies.)

For the first 15 minutes, the atmosphere was absolutely electric. This wasn’t a crowd that was there to get drunk and sunburned, this was a crowd of Cub fans. There was a buzz that built to a crescendo with every pitch. And almost immediately after the game started, Affan and I were struck by the fact that everyone was in their seat – the usual crowds of people loitering around the concourse you see at every game, in every stadium, were not there. You know how at Arlington Cemetery, the tombstones line up in such a way that they’re in a straight line no matter what angle you’re looking at them from? That’s what Wrigley Field looked like – from every angle, you could see perfectly arranged lines of people sitting in the stands.

Unfortunately, that metaphor turned out to be a little too appropriate. The Cubs made three errors in the second, and Carlos Zambrano gave up five runs despite giving up just two well-struck balls, and poof! the excitement was gone. The atmosphere turned funereal in the middle innings; fans that just 30 hours before were certain this was their year sat silent and stunned. And by the 6th inning the mood changed again, this time to angry and sarcastic. In the first couple of innings the fans abused Manny Ramirez every time he came out to left field; by the top of the 7th the fans had turned all of their attention to their own Alfonso Soriano, calling him every name in the book.

The fans walked out a little later – those who stayed until the end – bitter, dejected, and down 2 games to none. Forty-eight hours later, their season would be over, but really most of them knew it was over that day. And it struck me how quickly even the best seasons can go bad, how the winningest team in the National League and one of the winning Cub teams of the last century can find its season prematurely over because of a little three-game slump.

I’ve been waiting for the Royals to return to the Promised Land for twenty years, and I can only imagine the elation that I’ll feel when it comes to pass. But if and when it happens, we ought to enjoy every fleeting moment, because it can pass quickly. The last time the Royals made the playoffs, they only let four teams out of 26 into the dance. Now it’s eight out of 30, which means making the playoffs is the easy part. An American League team has a 4/14 (28.6%) chance of making the playoffs, but once in, the odds of winning out is just 1/8 (12.5%). Brewer fans waited 26 years to make the playoffs, then had their dream end in less than a week – and now expect to lose their two best starters to free agency.

Right now, I want to see the playoffs in the worst possible way. But I’m sure that, once the Royals get there, I’ll want them to stay there as long as possible, not just in terms of that October, but for as many Octobers to come as possible. A fluke playoff appearance would be great and all, but what’s really great is to make the playoffs and know that it's not be a fluke.

I can’t express my admiration of the Tampa Bay Rays enough: that’s a team that’s a game away from the 2008 World Series in part because it wasn’t built for 2008 at all. As a general rule of thumb, franchises that try to build a long-term winner will find that success comes in the short term as well, and franchises that are building for short-term success will find that their term is shorter than they thought. (See also Chiefs, Kansas City.)

The Rays remind different people of different teams from years past, but they remind me of no team so much as the 1991 Braves, another team that had suffered through so many losing seasons that they were safely considered the laughingstock of the league; a team that had benefited from all that losing in the form of so many high draft picks; and a team that a few years before had replaced its inept leadership with people who actually knew what the hell they were doing. The 1991 Braves and 2008 Rays also represent probably the two most dramatic defensive makeovers in modern baseball history.

I remember the perception at the time was that the Braves were having one of those miracle seasons out of nowhere, but that few people expected them to have real staying power. But you looked at that team, with three brilliant young starters, a savvy manager, and a farm system that was spitting out talent every year, and you could tell that they weren’t just a great team, they were becoming a great franchise. I don’t think anyone expected 14 straight division titles or anything, but there was no reason to think that they were a flash in the pan either. Same thing with the Rays. It’s easy to look at the last 10 years and think that 2008 is just one of those crazy years where everything goes right for them, and that they’ll be back to looking up at the Red Sox and Yankees in the standings next year. Don’t make that mistake. Just because the transformation in the Rays is sudden doesn’t mean it’s not real.

That’s the transformation I want to see in Kansas City. The 2003 season was great fun, but even when they were winning and in first place it felt like a dream, and the whole season we just waited for the dream to end. Rob Neyer and I were at a Rockies game during the SABR convention just before the All-Star Break, and an acquaintance asked what we thoughts the odds were that the Royals would make the playoffs. (The Royals were 4.5 games up at the time.) Rob answered 15%; I answered 25%. “Really? You’ve got a five-game lead!” he said. “Yeah,”, we both replied, “but they’re the Royals.”

I want the Royals to win, but more than that, I want the Royals to return to being the sort of team that when someone says, “they’re the Royals,” it’s a compliment. The Rays haven’t just won a lot of games this year, they’ve changed how people think when someone mentions their name. The team went so far as to change their name; “Devil Rays” still connotes a sense of incorrigible, LaMar-ian stupidity, but “Rays” makes you think of the little kid on the block that everyone used to beat up on, but who’s suddenly hit puberty and is starting to wail on any and all comers, and while none of the older kids know if he’s been taking boxing lessons or if his parents hired him a personal trainer or if he’s just been lucky, no one wants to be the one to find out. (I’ll take “tortured sports analogies” for $800, Alex.)

The Royals had a good year, but realistically their outlook for 2009 and 2010 hasn’t changed much at all; if anything, the odds that they can sneak up and take the division in 2010 has probably declined a little simply because neither Alex Gordon nor Billy Butler had the true breakout season that the Royals need them to have. Dayton Moore says changes are coming, and I welcome them. But I don’t want him to lose sight of the big picture in the process.

The farm system is improving, and more importantly, the culture of player development is improving. The Royals are spending big money in the draft, they’re active in Latin America, they’ve got more minor league teams than everyone else. But the first changes that Moore planted when he took over will take five years to bear fruit, and right now we’re barely two years in. And I don’t want us to lose sight of the big picture, because for all the ink and electrons wasted on Jose Guillen and Ross Gload this year, the reality is that we all should be talking about Mike Moustakas and Eric Hosmer and even Danny Duffy and Yowill Espinal, because those are the guys who are the centerpiece of Moore’s core strategy: the strategy to build a long-term winning franchise in Kansas City, whether it comes in 2009 or 2011 or 2013.

If Dayton Moore is penning a new book in the history of the Royals, then Chapter 1 ended when Buddy Bell was let go after the 2007 season. Chapter 2 ended this September. Chapter 3 opens with Moore vowing to separate the guys he needs to keep from the guys he needs to get rid of. It’s been a promising book so far, but we’re still a couple of chapters away from the really juicy stuff. Let’s keep the faith, and keep reading.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hope he learned something from that JP Howell for Joey Gathright trade. What a great move for TB. Not so much for us.

Casper said...

Welcome back, Rany. I was hoping you'd drop some thoughts on the Seitzer hiring though.

Shelby said...

Questions on my mind:

- Is Zack Greinke a Royal next season? If not, will we get a couple of worthy prospects or will we get a power-hitting corner OFer?

- Are the "can't miss" prospects Alex Gordon and Billy Butler even a part of the equation for The Future?

- Is Soria worth more as a starting pitcher, keeping in mind the risks of transitioning him?

- Is Ryan Shealy capable of being an above-league-average 1B?

- Is Mike Aviles a serviceable SS, and if not will he be an above-league-average 2B? Can he be as productive as he was in 2008?

- 3B?

Anonymous said...

Yowill Espinal? Is this the kid that struck out 42 times and only managed 2 walks?
I'll give him the pass because he's 17, but that's still reaching.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for posting again. I had been checking every day for a new post. Glad to have you back.

Anonymous said...

I believe the Royals are going to bust out this year. Gordon will finally get to the promise everyone thought he had. Guillen will keep the clubhouse stirred up but his 30 homers and 100+ RBIs will do most of his talking. Greinke, Meche and two days of rest will get us back to Greinke and Meche :) Greinke will win 18 games this year and Meche will be right there with 17. Bannister will be history and "Hoch" will get himself together to notch 14 wins with a 4.50 ERA. Yeah these are dreams but life... of such are dreams made.

Luke-a-Duke said...

Thank God you're back! If I don't have something new all the time between your and Posnanski's blogs, my days just aren't complete!!

Anonymous said...

Good to see you back in the saddle Rany. I really appreciate your blog.

Anonymous said...

Just in General, what do you think the Royals would have to give up to get Jake Peavy?

Would it even be worth it?

Anonymous said...

I couldn't agree more, Rany. I posted over at Royals Review a while back that it would probably take a $110-115 million payroll for the Royals to legitimately compete for a division next year, based on the numerous holes that we still have. Obviously, that's not going to happen. All of the points you make regarding the farm system are very positive, but it's going to take some time to bear fruit. I don't want to wait, but nor do I want us to sacrifice our future in order to move up a few wins in 2009.

Glad you're back, I've checked every day to see if you've posted. Keep up the good work

Nick says: said...

Hi, Rany. I've been reading your blog and printed material for a bit, but have never commented, for one reason or another -- until now.

This post, more than perhaps any other I've read here, communicated to me why I love reading what you write: you are truly a Royals fan to your very core.

Don't get me wrong -- I love the stats. I think the numbers in baseball, more than in any other sport, give an insight that allows you to see just how the game works. But just hearing about how you long for the Royals to win, how you hope and hope for the playoffs, makes me smile -- mostly because that's exactly how I feel about our Boys in Blue, too.

I'm 23, and was born less than a month after the Royals won the World Series. This, as you know, means I've only experienced a Royals playoff game in my imagination. And come to think of it, I've really only had 1 winning season ('03) that I was old enough to enjoy. Hope and desire for a great team is all I, as a lifelong Royals fan, have ever had to hang on to.

It's nice to know that even someone as smart and reality-based as yourself has this same feeling inside of him. From one writer to another, thank you for yet another well-written, though provoking and smile-inducing post.

kcghost said...

Whether you like him or not, GMDM is the only horse we have to ride. With Butler and Gordon turning into "just guys" we just desperately need the farm system to produce some bona fide studs.

Kansas City said...

Was Buddy Bell "let go?" I never heard that. I thought his resignation was strange, but legitimate.

Anonymous said...

Isn't the Rays season a commentary on how being good is based on the talents and toughness of your core players?

A lot of bad teams in a variety of sports try to "change the culture" by bringing in mediocre, experienced veterans to teach the young guys how to win. Strangely, most of those players have either 1) never been winners, or 2) their skills have deteriorated to the point where, on the field at least, they actually drag down the team's performance.

Both of those characteristics accomplish the exact opposite of the intended effect. Not surprisingly, those players often represent a barrier to the manager becoming the true role model and leader.

Obviously Jose Guillen's season was a disaster on and off the field, but even if he'd been a better player and less of a malcontent, it's hard to see how his contributions would have been a net positive.

The two biggest contrasts between the Royals and Rays are this: 1) Whether because of philosophy or budget, the Rays were completely committed to riding out the crappy years without bridge players like Guillen (imagine how much worse the Rays would be with Guillen on their roster even if he was playing there for free). 2) Joe Maddon has been able to establish himself as the franchise face in a way that Trey Hillman has so far failed at.

I think those two items are linked. Moore is doing a tremendous job building the Royals now in a similar manner to the Rays, but it is imperative that he not make this type of mistake again if he wants all that building to come to fruition.